BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Zheng XL, Chen T, Yu Y, Wang N, Jiang B, Yao Y, Zhao YF, Yu XX, Su CL. Risk factors for pathological upgrading pre- and post-endoscopic resection of colorectal adenoma: A retrospective study. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(2): 123433 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.123433]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
WJTM is recognized as a user-friendly academic journal within the field, which delivers relatively fast overall peer review turnaround and provides highly constructive, targeted reviewer comments that can effectively enhance the scientific quality and logical completeness of submitted manuscripts to a considerable degree. The online submission system of this journal demands authors to upload a comprehensive array of formal supporting certification documents throughout the submission workflow, and this mandatory document requirement stands out and differs significantly from the submission rules and standards adopted by journals released by other mainstream publishing houses. Accordingly, authors are strongly advised to carry out full and meticulous preparatory work and organize all required supporting materials well in advance before formally uploading their manuscripts to the journal’s submission platform.